HEALING CHRONIC WOUNDS PERFORMED
ON MOUSE EARS USING SILICA (SiO2)
AS A HOMEOPATHIC REMEDY

A Pharmacological Study of Homeopathic High Dilutions

 

 

M. OBERBAUM, Z. WEISMAN, A. KALINKOVICH, Z. BENTWICH

Ruth Ben-Ari Institute of Clinical Immunology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot;
The Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel

 

 
1 - Introduction
2 - Material and methods
3 - Results
4 - Discussion
5 - References

 

1. Introduction

 

Homoeopathic medicine frequently uses potencies of silica, especially as a treatment for abscesses, discharging fistulas, chronic ulcers, discharging wounds and keloids and rejection of foreign bodies (Jouanny, 1985; Metzger, 1981). It is also known as a deep-acting constitutional remedy. However, one major advantage of experimenting with potencies of silica is the fact, that it can be applied indicatively without the need to individualize. This characteristic is not common in homeopathy, since individualization is one of the basic requirements  of homeopathy. Thus, the property of silica for "anti-chronic inflammation" is exceptional and makes it possible to prescribe it in most cases that suit this definition. It is also worth nothing that unpotentized silica, has a use in conventional biomedical science, as a substance with inhibitory and cytotoxic activity on macrophages (Moseley et al., 1988; Gennari et al., 1987; Bowers et al., 1998; Souvannavong and Adams, 1990). These are the reasons why we have decided to investigate the effect of various dilutions of silica on wound healing. For this purpose we have developed a model of a chronic wound in experimental animals that would simulate the situations in which silica is used in homoeopathy and the results of the studies with this model are hereby reported.

 

 

2. Material and Methods

 

2.1.  ANIMALS AND WOUND PERFORMANCE

 

Female C57Bl/6 mice, 12-16 weeks old, were used in the study. After an adaptation period of 2 weeks, the lobe of one ear of each mouse was perforated with dental wire, weighing 110f,10 mg. The ends of the wire were twisted together to form an "earring". The constant friction of the wire along edges of the wound, resulted in a chronic irritation. Without treatment, the wire caused a hole of variable size, which was a function of the properties of the tissue, the weight of the hanging wire and the detrimental effect of the constant irritation caused by the earring. In some cases the wire "cut" with  time the ear,  and fell off. In the most cases the wound healed  and the hole closed around the wire, producing  granulation and later scar tissue.

                The animals were divided into three or four groups in experiments 1-9 and 10-13, respectively, of ten animals per group (except for experiment no. 1, in which there were four animals per group). The animals were treated with silica dilutions of 5 C, 30 C and saline in experiments 1-9 and an additional dilution, namely, 200 C in experiments 10-13. The animals were given i.p. injections three times a day in experiments 1-2, and oral administration, via drinking water, in experiments 3-13.

 

2.2. PREPARATION OF DILUTIONS

 

The silica dilutions were prepared by Dolisos (France) according to the official  French Pharmacopoeia. All the dilutions were centesimal dilutions (100-n). The first two steps were performed by trituration of silicium oxide (SiO2) with lactose powder at 1:100 relation (1 C and 2 C), followed by dissolving one part of the triturated powder in 99 parts of 70% alcohol. This dilution (3 C) was vigorously sucussed using a dynamizator. All the subsequent dilutions were prepared using the same technique. In the last two dilutions, saline was used as the diluent, instead of alcohol, these two dilutions were renewed once a week, and kept in a refrigerator at 4° C. The control dilutions were prepared in the same way, "diluting" alcohol in alcohol; the last two control dilutions were done in saline.

 

2.3. METHOD OF EVALUATION

 

In experiments 1-3, a subjective evaluation of the hole size was made, on a scale of 0 (closed hole, tight around the wire) to 4 (very large hole). This was done by two independent observers. In the other experiments we added also an objective evaluation of the hole size on the last day of the experiment, using an image analysis system (Galai, Haifa, Israel). The hole was photographed by an electronic camera and the data were transferred to an IBM/AT computer, which calculated the hole size.The hole size of an ear that was "cute" by the wire, was evaluated as if the border of the hole were the edge of the ear.

 

 

3. Results

 

3.1.  PRELIMINARY RESULTS

 

The preliminary experiment was performed on a small number of animals per group, in order to find out whether there would be any reaction when silica is used for a chronic wound. All the mice had been treated for 32 days with three i.p. injections of 0.5 ml of the dilutions, daily. On day 14, the earrings were hanged on the mouse ears.

                On the 5th day  after the earrings were inserted,  a clear difference  was observed in the hole size between the ears of treated mice and those of the control group. This difference was maintained until the end of the experiment (day 32). No sign of closure of the holes around the wires in the control group was  observed . In the treated group, there was a strong development of granulation tissue, which closed the hole until it disappeared completely (figure 1). An evaluation of the hole size, which was performed with the image analyzer from the photograph of the holes, revealed a significant difference between the groups (p < 0.01 in one-way ANOVA test) and between each of the treated groups and the control group (p < 0.01 according to the Student t- test).


 



Figure 1. Evaluation of hole size in wounded ears of mice receiving intraperitoneal silica administration. Fourteen days after i.p. injection  of silica dilutions or saline were begun, one ear of each mouse was perforated with dental wire, which was twisted to form an "earring."  Eighteen days after insertion of the earrings, the ears with holes were photographed, and the hole size in the photograph was evaluated using an image analysis system.

 

 

 

 

3.2. KINETICS OF THE THERAPEUTIC EFFECT

 

Encouraged by the dramatic effects reached in the preliminary study, we attempted to evaluate the kinetics of the therapeutic effect. A daily evaluation of the hole size was made, starting from the 3rd day after the start of the experiment, until day 20. Contrary to the first experiment, the dilutions were not injected but were added to the drinking water. In this way, we reduced stress of holding down the animals and injecting them, three times daily. The figure 2 shows the difference in hole size between the treated groups and the control group which progressively increased, reaching its maximum on day 9  (p < 0.05 in Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance and in Pearson chi square test). The figure also shows a difference in hole size between the mice treated with the lowest dilution (5 C) and those treated with the higher dilution (30 C). The healing process was stronger at the high dilutions. After day 10, there was no difference between the groups, and the hole size in the control group was equivalent to that in the treated group. Contrary to the first experiment, the beneficial therapeutic effect did not last until the end of the experiment.

 

 

 

Figure 2. Evaluation of hole sizes in wounded ears of mice receiving oral silica administration. Dental wire was inserted into the ears of mice as described in Figure 1. In parallel, either silica dilutions or saline was added to the drinking water throughout the experiment. The hole size was subjectively evaluated daily, beginning from the third day and continuing until the twentieth day of the experiment.

 

3.3. THE INFLUENCE OF THE "EARRINGS" ON THE THERAPEUTIC EFFECT

 

The question, whether there is really a need for the earring, or, in other words, if there is a need for a chronic irritation in order to obtain these results was examined in another experiment in which we perforated an additional hole, in the second ear. The holes were made with an instrument that made holes of a constant size. In these ears, no earrings were inserted. In the attempt to improve the evaluation of the hole size, we added a scanning with an image analysis system in order to measure the hole size.

                Table 1 represents a comparison of the subjective evaluation with the objective measurement of the hole sizes, and shows a good correlation between the two. In this experiment also, which was terminated after 5 days, a significant effect of the silica dilutions on wound healing in the ears with earrings was observed. The higher dilutions had a significantly stronger effect on wound healing than did the low dilutions (p < 0.05 in one way ANOVA) (Figure 3).

 

 

 

TABLE 1. Comparison between objective and subjective evaluations of hole sizes in the ears of treated and untreated mice

   ____________________________________________________________________

   Treatment  Group                                                    Method of Evaluation

   ____________________________________________________________________

 

                                                                  Subjective*               Image Analyzer**

                                                  _________________________________________

   Saline                                                      1.59                         37269

 

   SiO2 10-10                                0.5                           23644

 

   SiO2 10-60                                 0.4                           16469

   _____________________________________________

* Mean of the subjective evaluation using a scale of  0 = a hole closed tight around  the wire, to 4 = a very large hole.

** Mean hole size (square microns)

 

 

 

Figure 3. Evaluation of hole size, with and without dental wire, in wounded ears of mice. The protocol  was the same as that in Figure 2, and in addition, a hole was made in the other ear without inserting wire earrings. The experiment continued for 5 days, and an objective evaluation of the results was made using an image analysis system. Figure 3 shows the hole size in ears with dental wire earrings.

 

 

               On the perforated ear without the earring, there was  no significant difference in hole size between the treated and the control group (Figure 4).

 

 

 

Figure 4. See legend to Figure 3 for protocol. Hole size in ears without dental wire earrings: no significant difference was seen between the treated and untreated groups.

 

 

 

3.4. THE THERAPEUTIC EFFECT OF VERY HIGH DILUTIONS

 

In order to determine whether the observation that the higher the dilution is, the stronger are its therapeutic properties is consistent, we added another dilution to the experiment, namely a 200 C. There was a similar finding as in the previous experiments, with a stronger effect of the 200 C dilution on the animals treated with it (on day 7 of the experiment): the average area of the holes in the ears of the mice treated with saline was 72799 square microns whereas the average area of the holes in the mice treated with Silica 5 C, 30 C and 200 C was 56195 square microns, 31484 square microns and 28222 square microns, respectively (Figure 5), the difference between hole areas being significant (p < 0.001 in one-way ANOVA).

 

3.5. SUMMARY OF REPETITIONS OF THE EXPERIMENTS

 

In three of the remaining nine experiments, a clear therapeutic effect of silica dilutions was observed while in the six others, no significant therapeutic effect could be shown;  in three of the six the reason was most probably technical: In the first, we tried to hang silver rings in order to obtain a stronger inflammatory effect; the silver caused a very strong irritation and large holes which did not show a tendency to close. In the second experiment, we used very thin dental wire, its weight was not heavy enough to cause sufficient chronic irritation, the wounds remained too small and closed quickly and tightly around the wire. In the third experiment we hung earrings on both ears of each animal in order to see if there was a difference in hole size between ears; there was no significant difference between groups or between the two ears of an individual. In the remaining three experiments, the holes did not develop and closed immediately around the wire; the reason for this was not clear.

 

 

 

Figure 5. The protocol was similar to the previous experiment except that a group treated with a higher dilution of silica (10-400) was added. The experiment continued for 7 days.

 

4. Discussion

 

The present study represents the results of almost 2 years of work. It could be shown, that the healing of chronic irritated wounds, caused by hanging a metal earring from mouse ears, could be enhanced, by treatement with homoeopathic dilutions of silica (SiO2). This phenomenon was repeated several times, checked carefully, and was statistically highly significant. The process of wound healing reached its peak after a period of 3-10 days. Subsequently  there was an evening up between the treated groups and the control group ( experiment b, Figure 2). In that experiment it seems that the wound healing proceeded in two phases (Figure 2): in the first phase it led, most probably due to the chronic irritation and the weight of the earrings, to an enlargement of the holes (the peak in Figure 2 occurred at days 7-9). At the end of that phase the reparative process started, in which the wound started to heal and its size diminished. This phase reached its peak in all groups at the same time (day 10 in Figure 2). According to this observation it seems that the silica was active mainly in the first phase, in halting or slowing down the process of wound enlargement, and less in diminishing the wound size.

                It is difficult to assume that these results are due to wrong evaluation methods. In the first two experiments we evaluated the hole size subjectively. In the third experiment we added an objective method and from the fourth experiment on, we used only this objective method, namely evaluation with an image analysis system. It should be noted that the results of this method, which are free of an observer bias proved to be similar to the results of the subjective evaluation (Table 1). It is also unlikely that the effects that were shown are due to "mistakes" in the preparation of the dilutions, since they could be shown in almost all the groups that were treated, as compared with the control groups. These effects  were consistent  (Figure 2). The mice in the control group had been treated in the same way, kept in similar cages and under the same conditions as the treated animals, and thus these factors could not be the reasons for the significant differences between the groups.

                The argument that the "stress condition" of the injected animals could be the reason for the difference between the groups, can hardly be supported since there could not be any reason why the animals that were treated with the active dilution should react differently to the "stress", from  the mice that were treated with the control dilution. The argument that there was a "difference" in the way the injections were given between the groups, is also very unlikely since in most experiments there was a clear advantage to the groups that were treated with the active dilutions over the control groups, and also when these were added to the drinking water.

                Additional support to the idea that the active dilutions of silica may have a curative effect on healing of chronic wounds, can be obtained from the experiment that showed a therapeutic effect only in the ears that had earrings hung on them. There was no difference in the hole size of the ears that were just "perforated" and did not have earrings hung from them, between the treated groups and the control groups (experiment c, Figures 3 and 4).

                Another possibility that was raised was that some molecules of SiO2 remained in the solution due to adhesion to the tube walls. This idea has to be rejected, since in any dilution just 1 % of the previous dilution was used and besides, it is hard to ignore the fact that the higher the dilution was, the stronger the therapeutic effect was (10-400 > 10-60 >10-10 ). This observation resembles the effects of homoeopathic remedies in the homoeopathic medicine in which the higher the dilution is, the deeper, stronger and more long-lasting the remedy acts.

                There is however a difficulty explaining the "failures" of some experiments: six experiments out of 13 failed. In three of them, the reason was  technical: different wire (too thin, silver wires), and an experiment in which we hanged a wire on both ears. In the three other experiments which failed, the reasons for the failure are not clear. It is important to note that the significance of the successful experiments was more than enough to draw the conclusion that the effect was more than a random result. Moreover: in none of the experiments was there a "therapeutic effect" of the control dilution. The issue of the reproducibility  of homeopathic studies is certainly one of the big difficulties in homoeopathic research.

                An interesting aspect of the study is the "conventional" aspects of the influence of SiO2 on biological systems. As mentioned at the beginning of this paper, there are many  scientific publications showing the influence of SiO2 on macrophages, and through them, on the immunological reaction (Moseley et al., 1988; Gennari et al., 1987; Bowers et al., 1998; Souvannavong and Adams, 1990). There are also reports on curative effects of SiO2  on experimental induced autoimmune diseases such as myasthenia gravis and diabetes mellitus (Kinoshita et al., 1988; Charlton et al., 1988). As far as we know, there has been only one controlled study examining the influence of very low doses of SiO2 on an animal model (Davenas et al., 1987). In that study it was shown that application of 10-19M SiO2 in the drinking water of C57BL/6 mice caused an increase in the activity of the macrophages which were isolated from the treated animals, compared with a control group. In that work, the dilutions still contained some molecules, even though  the concentrations used, were several orders of magnitude lower than those used in the conventional studies. In a part of our experiments, (experiments 10-13), we went even further and used dilutions above the Avogadro number. To the best of our knowledge, these dilutions do not contain any molecules of SiO2.

                We are aware of the problematic nature of the results described herein. Not only do we claim that the lower the concentration, the stronger the reaction is, but we found "dilutions" that do not contain anything that still have a biological activity. We don't have any good explanation for this phenomenon. There are today several attempts to explain the activity of such "dilutions" (Bernard, 1965; Kumar and Jussal, 1979; Agnastostatos et al., 1991). Almost all of them claim that the "drug information" is transferred to the diluent, and that the diluent turns into the carrier of the "drug information". In other words, if the drug/remedy is the "key" and the diluent is the "lock",  so the therapeutic effect is attained with the "lock" and not the "key". Be it as it may, the significance of the results we describe is in showing that such effects do exist and that they cannot be accounted by placebo effect.

 

 

References

 

Anagnostatos, G.S., Vithoulkas, G., Garzonis, P. and Tavouxoglou, C. (1991) A working hypothesis for homoeopathic microdiluted remedies, The Berlin J. Res.Homoeopathy, 1, 141-147.

Bernard, G.P. (1965) Microdose paradox- a new concept, J. Am  Institute of Homoeopathy, 58, 205-212.

Bowers, W.E., Ruhoff, M.S., Goodell, E.M. and Stoltenborg, J.K. (1988) The effect of  silica treatment on accessory cell-dependent rat T lymphocyte proliferation, Immunobiology, 176, 179-194.

Charlton, B., Bacelj, A. and Mandel, T.E. (1988) Administration of silica particles or anti-Lyt2 antibody prevents beta-cell destruction in NOD mice given cyclophosphamide, Diabetes, 37, 930-935.

Davenas, E., Poitevin, B. and Benveniste, J. (1987) Effect of mouse peritoneal macrophages of orally administered very high dilutions of silica, Eur. J .Pharmacol., 135, 313-319.

Gennari, M., Bouthillier, Y., Ibanez, O.M. et  al. (1987) Effect of silica on the  genetic regulation of antibody responsiveness, Ann. Inst. Pasteur  Immunol. 138, 359-370.

Jouanny, J. (1985) The Essentials of Homoeopathic Materia Medica,  Laboratoires Boiron Publishers, Ste-Foy-les-Lyon, France. pp.86-91.

Kinoshita, I., Nakamura, T., Satoh, A. et al. (1988) Role of the macrophage in the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis, J. Neurol.Sci.  87, 49-59.

Kumar, A.and Jussal R.A. (1979) A hypothesis on the nature of homoeopathic potencies, Br .Hom. J., 68, 197-204.

Metzger, J. (1981) Gesichtete Homoeopathische Arzneimittellehre, K.F.  Haug Publisher, Heidelberg, pp.1320-1332.

Moseley, P.L., Monick, M. and Hunninghake, G.W. (1988) Divergent effects of silica on lymphocyte proliferation and immunoglobulin production, J Appl  Physiol, 65, 350-357.

Souvannavong ,V., Adam, A. (1990) Macrophages from C3H/HeJ mice require an  additional step to produce monokines: synergistic effects of silica and poly(I:C) in the release of interleukin 1, J. Leukoc. Biol. 48, 183-192.

 

Home Page